Part 1The four result states were not confirmed by the product facts
The client material only confirms that the tool checks whether a public Reddit profile is reachable and reports live or potentially shadowbanned totals. It does not confirm that the tool can reliably separate a shadowban from a deleted or nonexistent account.
I wrote all four requested result states, but used “appears to be shadowbanned” to avoid claiming certainty. To do this properly, we need the tool’s exact response rules and confirmation that Reddit returns enough information to distinguish all four states.
Part 2Recent-post checking was not confirmed
“Where the product supports it, also report whether recent posts appear publicly.”
The client material does not say that the checker tests recent posts or comments. I did not add recent-post results to the tool. Instead, I explained how readers can check an individual post while logged out.
We need confirmation that the finished tool checks recent activity, plus the exact result fields and limits, before this can appear in the result panel.
Part 3Timestamp support was not confirmed
“Show a timestamp so buyers, sellers and account owners can keep or share a record of the check.”
The client material says the tool displays recent checks, but it does not confirm that each result includes a timestamp. I added {{CHECK_DATE}} and {{CHECK_TIME}} placeholders as requested.
We need confirmation that timestamps will be generated, along with the timezone and display format.
Part 4Guest limits and login behavior were unclear
“No login, token or email gate.”
The client material says users can sign up or log in to use the tool without the stated guest limitations, but it does not define those guest limitations. It also says the tool accepts up to five usernames per check.
I treated five usernames as the limit for a logged-out check and did not mention sign-up, free points or extra access. We need the exact guest limits and confirmation that anyone can complete a check without an REDAccs account.
Part 5Unlimited use and username storage were not confirmed
“If accurate for the finished product, state that it is free, unlimited and does not store checked usernames.”
Only the “free” claim was supported. The client material does not confirm unlimited checks or say whether checked usernames are stored. In fact, the display of recent checks suggests some check data may be retained.
I called the checker free but omitted the unlimited-use and no-storage claims. We need the usage limits, storage policy, retention period and details on what appears under recent checks.